Saturday 23 October 2021

The last free-ranging horses in Europe were hybrids

EDIT: The individual examined in the study is actually the Shatilov tarpan, a specimen which was also caught in the Cherson region but died in 1868. 

The nature of the horses described in contemporaneous literature from previous centuries, such as by Gmelin, Pallas, Smith and others, has long been dubious. It was unclear if those horses were genuine wild horses, feral domestic horses or hybrids. In the Russian steppe, these free-ranging horses of the 18th to the early 20th century were called "tarpans". 
The fact that a black dun colour prevailed in these historic reports may suggest that these horses were at least partly wild horses, because black dun or black was the prevalent colour of late Holocene European wild horses. However, the fact that also non-wildtype colours were mentioned in these reports suggests admixture. The mane of the last free-ranging horse of the Russian steppe was described as being semi-erect, as to be expected from a hybrid between a horse with an upright mane and a falling domestic mane. 
The Cherson Tarpan, photographed in 1884

Librado et al. 2021 examined the genome of the so-called Cherson Tarpan, the only "tarpan" to be photographed. It revealed that at least this individual has a hybrid origin of western wild horses and domestic horses. To be precise, the authors write: "The tarpan horse came about following admixture between horses native to Europe [...] and horses closely related to DOM2". A hybrid origin for the free-ranging horses described in historic references makes sense. That they were pure wild horses was unlikely due to their phenotype (domestic colour variants et cetera). That they were merely feral horses was also unlikely because black dun prevails in these reports, and it would be a big coincidence if feral domestic horses also were mainly black dun in colour. Also, I have always considered it the most likely scenario that the pure wild horse did not die out as a whole but got continuously genetically influenced by feral domestic horses. So it seems that this scenario is confirmed, at least under the assumption that not only the Cherson tarpan but all the other free-ranging horses of Europe during the 18th to 20th century were hybrids. 
The information that the horses historically called "tarpans" might help to stop the inappropriate synonymization of the word "tarpan" with the original European wild horses. 

The study's main purpose was the origin of the domestic horse. They conclude that the domestic horse most likely originated in the lower Volga-Don region, and that mutations on two genes were of particular importance for the domestication of the horse: one on the GSDMC gene, probably improving the horses' ability for bearing weight on their back, and one on the ZFPM1 gene, probably reducing the fear response and increasing the docility of the horses. 
The study, however, completely ignores the work of Taylor et al. 2021 that concluded that the Botai horses were not domestic

Literature: 

Librado et al. 2021: The origins and spread of domestic horses from the Western Eurasian steppes. 2021. 

6 comments:

  1. Reginald Winkler23 October 2021 at 06:45

    Thank you very much for the interesting contribution. May I take this opportunity to refer to another study on equids that deals with their ecological role in arid areas?

    https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.abd6775

    https://www.tagesspiegel.de/wissen/wasserversorgung-fuer-ein-ganzes-oekosystem-wie-pferde-und-esel-wuesten-beleben/27146116.html

    It would be interesting to investigate what role this aspect may have played before and during the domestication of horses?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Daniel, this paper is very interesting but has left a few open questions (I have to reread it). People were discussing it on Twitter talking about the various species involved and which one was domesticated; is it not true that all the horses sampled from Iberia to the pontic steppe and further east were not different species or subspecies but just different local populations of equus ferus and that they just showed a local relatedness that could be tracked over time to show that this local population replaced other local populations but still the same species? I saw Taylor from Taylor et al discussing the harassment he received for that paper, poor guy, I hope he is proven correct in time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. To be fair, the manuscript for this paper was likely submitted before the new study on the Botai horses came out

    ReplyDelete
  4. I guess I have to re-read Taylor et als paper... As far as I recall, their objection to the claim that the Botai horse were domesticated, was that the tear and wear on the Botai horses theeth COULD be due to specifik condition and not due to bits in the horses mouth. If they are right - the conclusion could be, that the Botai horses were not used as riding horses. (But the assumption they were ridden can not be excluded)
    But the finding of traces of horse milk in Botai potsherds shows that the Botai horse was indeed domesticated! (Hint take a look at Rodeos where cowboys milk unmanaged cows - domesticated but
    "wild cows" - not trained to be milked.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can only recommend re-reading Taylor et al. They were also questioning the milk traces, and suggesting that the age structure of the findings does not support pasturing, as well as associations of some skulls with arrowheads suggesting that the horses were hunted and other arguments.

      Delete
  5. "The origins and spread of domestic horses from the Western Eurasian steppes."

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04018-9

    ReplyDelete