Saturday 25 September 2021

Using wild yaks for "breeding-back"?

I already did a post on the question if it would be wise to use existing wild bovines for crossbreeding in “breeding-back” a few years ago. I came to the conclusion that it is not recommendable to use hybridization with other wild bovines for “breeding-back” for a number of reasons. For once, while cattle are probably ecologically and ethologically identical with the aurochs and are derivations of the same species, other bovine species differ in behaviour (f.e. banteng fight less than domestic cattle, yak have a different display behaviour by using their tail tuft) and also ecology (banteng are a tropical species and eat more tree fruits than cattle do, yaks are more adapted mountainous habitat while the aurochs was a lowland species that preferred plain habitat). Therefore, the argument that “breeding-back” results are ethologically and ecologically identical with the aurochs as they are derivations of the same species would be gone. Furthermore, the acceptance for a species hybrid in the European wilderness would be lower than for “just” feral cattle. 

 

However, I am starting to believe that using careful, small doses of hybridization with wild yaks could be worth a try. 

 

I am mainly thinking about this because of the horns of wild yaks. If you want to see an animal that has horns exactly looking like those of an aurochs, look at wild yaks. It is fascinating how the horns are really identical in both species. See here, here or here. The curvature matches that of the aurochs’ horns as much as the relative and absolute size. Horn tips that truly curl inwards as much as in the aurochs is rare in “breeding-back”, and also rare in primitive taurine cattle, which is why I consider this trait one of the challenges for “breeding-back”. Strict selection would be necessary to produce this kind of horn shape, which would take its time and selection also has to care about other traits as well, while crossbreeding with wild yaks could produce that horn shape quite fast. 

Another reason is the morphology of the wild yak. A hairless wild yak superficially resembles an aurochs. They have a large hump in both sexes and usually a very long snout. Also, they have a comparably short trunk in both sexes. As the right horn shape, these traits are comparably rare in “breeding-back” and primitive taurine cattle. Most “breeding-back” cattle have a hump that is smaller than in the aurochs, and a truly large hump is mainly restricted to Spanish fighting cattle. The very long snouts of many aurochs bulls has not yet been reproduced by “breeding-back”. Wild yaks would thus also be beneficial for morphological traits. 

Also, the body size fits European aurochs. Wild yak bulls reach 170 to 205 cm withers height [1,2], which is the upper size class of European aurochs bulls. This very large size would be very useful for breeding for large size, especially as it compensates the small sizes of breeds used like Heck cattle (in Hungarian Taurus cattle), Watussi (in Auerrind and Hungarian Taurus cattle), Pajuna (Tauros cattle and Auerrind) or Highland (Tauros cattle). 

 

Thus, using wild yaks would speed up the process of achieving aurochs horns, body size and morphology considerably. Another advantage is that wild yaks are very cold-adapted and have a very dense undercoat. This would compensate the use of Watussi, which is adapted to a subtropical climate. Also, the yak is predominantly a grass eater, and thus ecologically overlaps with cattle. Crossbreeding with wild yaks would also lead to an increase in physiological fitness: wild yaks have a higher endurance than domestic yaks (and possibly domestic cattle), a more efficient respiratory metabolism as domestic yaks (and possibly domestic cattle), a more efficient digestion (the weight of wild yaks increases during winter, whereas that of domestic yaks and cattle decreases) and a lower death rate during winter [3,4]. 

 

To sum up the benefits of crossbreeding with wild yaks in “breeding-back”: 

- Wild yaks have horns identical to those of the European aurochs. 

- Wild yaks have large humps, a short trunk and a long snout

- The body size of wild yaks matches that of large aurochs and would compensate the use of small breeds 

- Wild yaks are very cold-adapted with a dense undercoat what would compensate the use of Watussi 

- The wild yak has a higher physiological fitness than domestic yaks and possibly domestic cattle 

 

However, there are some problems. Of course typical yak traits, behavioural (f.e. presenting their tail tuft when threatened) and optical (f.e. the long hair on the ventral body side), would have to be selected out just as all other undesired traits. But some traits are not visible in the living animal:  

- Yaks have 14-15 rib pairs, while cattle/aurochs have 13 

- Yaks have a larger lung than cattle, an adaption for living in high altitudes 

- Yaks are adapted to a mountainous habitat, while cattle/aurochs prefer flat lowlands 

- Yak have less and barely functional sweat glands as an adaption to cold, which could be problematic in hot regions 

- Yak have a slightly different skull anatomy: in cattle/aurochs, the premaxilla reaches the nasal bone, while in yaks the premaxilla only reaches the maxilla and not the nasal bone 

 

As these traits are not visible, they can barely be actively eradicated by breeding. One possibility to get rid of them in the population is diluting the yak influence as greatly as possible, while at the same time taking care that the horns, snout length, body morphology and size remain in the population. 

I would take a herd of aurochs-like “breeding-back” cows and inseminate them with wild yak semen (obtaining a wild yak bull for breeding would be very difficult as they are barely kept in zoos). The F1 bulls would be infertile. Thus, I would take an aurochs-like “breeding-back” bull to cover all the F1 cows. The resulting B1 bulls might be fertile, but reduced. If they are not able to breed, I would cross the B1 cows with the “breeding-back” bull again. The resulting B2 bulls would be fertile in any case, and would be 12,5% wild yak. The B2 bull could be bred to the 25% wild yak cows, and then a F2 of that combination by crossbreeding the results could be produced. When crossbreeding, one must pay attention to only breed with the hybrids that have the desired horn shape, size and body shape. Hopefully this results in a bull that is about one third yak (strictly genealogically) but only has the horns, body size and large hump that reveals its wild yak ancestry, while obvious yak traits like the long ventral body hair would be gone. This bull, being an F2 individual of the new combination, might be stable for at least some of its traits and can be used for backcrossing with the pure “breeding-back” cows. I would remove the other yak hybrids then. This way, the resulting animals would be taurine cattle with merely introgression from wild yaks and the yak influence would be further diluted in future generations while the aurochs-like horns, body size and morphology would remain in the population. 

This plan would take five generations to produce the aurochs-like result using careful wild yak introgression. Very strict selective breeding using the best of the best “breeding-back” cattle could be successful in five generations too, on the other hand. 

 

I think executing this plan in an experimental herd would do no harm. Unfortunately this will probably never happen, as wild yaks are very difficult to obtain. They are rarely kept in zoos. As far as I know, the only wild yaks in captivity are found in two Chinese zoos and one in Chicago. 

I think it would be vital for the preservation of the wild yak to build up a solid population in captivity, ideally with a herd book in order to secure the purity of the animals (there is the danger of hybridization with domestic yaks). 

 

Literature 

 

[1] Castello: Bovids of the World. 2016. 

[2] Jianlin et al.: Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour of Wild cattle: Implications for conservation. 2014. 

[3] Zhonglin: Development of a new yak breed through utilization of wild yak genetic resource – serial technologies of the development of the Datong yak breed. 2004. 

[4] Lanzhou Institute of husbandry and pharmaceutical sciences: the 5th international conference on yak. 2015. 

 

 

20 comments:

  1. I think banteng would be preferable personally:

    Pros:
    - Not a member of the Bison subgenus (which yak should be), potentially limiting natural hybridization with wisent
    - Similar morphology (short trunk, large hump (but not to the degree seen in bison, yak, or gaur, much like the aurochs), long skull)
    - Similar ecological role (grazes more and browses less than wisent or gaur (tropical wisent equivalent?)) and habitat preference (flat lowlands)
    - Sexual dichromatism already established
    - Unlike wild yak, already available (Javan ssp) in European zoos
    - Same number of Cervical (7), Dorsal (13), and Lumbar (6) vertebrae (yaks have the same number of cervical, but an extra dorsal (14) and one fewer lumbar vertebrae (5))
    - Unclear how many ribs banteng have, but gaur have 13 and their close relationship would suggest banteng probably have the same
    - Javan banteng (though not Cambodian, probably due to kouprey hybridization) have the same number of chromosomes as cattle (60)

    Cons:
    - White markings (seems to be dominant in hybrids though so easy to breed out)
    - Horns (already an issue, could be bred against with breeds like watussi and maronesa)
    - Tropical (seem to do fine outdoors in cold climates, probably easy to breed against with Maremmana or other cold adapted breeds, worth noting that yaks are probably significantly more cold-tolerant than aurochs were, and there might be concern that interbreeding might actually increase backbred cattle distribution beyond what was typical for the parent species?)
    - Not sure the inclusion of more fruit in the diet is really a heritable thing or a result of the environment they live in, would be worth investigating whether tropical cattle do the same
    - Lower number of Sacral (4 vs 5) and Caudal (18 vs 21)l vertebrae
    Yak have the same number of Sacral vertebrae as cattle (5) but only 14 Caudal vertebrae

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course yak also have 60 chromosomes so that's kind of a point for both

      Delete
    2. Good arguments, Java Banteng would certainly be worth a try as well. BTW, do you maybe have a reference for the vertebrae count in Banteng as well as the different chromosome number in Cambodian banteng? I wasn't able to find anything about that (according to the references I have seen so far, all bovini have 60 chromosomes).

      Delete
    3. All Bovini have 60 except for Gaur, Kouprey, and Cambodian Banteng according to https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Chromosome-evolution-in-the-subtribe-Bovina-The-of-Ropiquet-Gerbault-Seureau/6ff1e9eff601d648e287fa3860d63e5c1cd98bc8

      Delete
    4. The Vertebrae counts were from “Delineations of the Ox Tribe” by George Vasey

      Delete
    5. Confirmed Banteng have 13 ribs: https://books.google.dk/books?id=IaFIAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA110&lpg=PA110&dq=%22banteng%22+%22ribs%22&source=bl&ots=dFUu0eW5IG&sig=ACfU3U2M_QZXEoTZYCIqS6aDkT7Q2XJLhg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi-3rDjnp3zAhV7_rsIHYnqAZEQ6AF6BAgeEAI#v=onepage&q=%22banteng%22%20%22ribs%22&f=false

      Delete
    6. I'm looking over the George Vasey book and it looks like the number of Banteng vertebrae is identical to the Zebu (7, 13, 6, 4, 18), and is also very similar to that of African buffalo, suggesting this number might be the ancestral state, with the bison/yak clade being more derived. It also means that additional Sacral and Caudal vertebrae might be a derived trait unique to Eurasian Aurochs/Cattle.

      Delete
    7. Very interesting, thanks for the information!

      Delete
  2. Would it be possible for Wisent, Wild Yaks and bred-back Aurochs to live together in a natural setting without interbreeding?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wisent and cattle tend to ignore each other when living in the same reserve, there never has been a documented case of spontaneous interbreeding between those two species in the wild. Regarding wisent to yak interbreeding, that's a good question. Yaks are closer to bison than to cattle, but that alone does not mean they would spontaneously interbreed in the wild. So far all the hybrids were produced under artificial conditions. Wisent x cattle hybrids need a C-section anyway, what means that they would not be able to form a hybrid population in the wild even if they would mate with each other.

      Delete
    2. But we know that wisent+aurochs hybrids happened in the past, and because wisents retain aurochs mtDNA, the hybrids must have resulted from male wisent and female aurochs, the same combination as would today produce zubrons. Perhaps the difficulty of that hybrid being produced is due to other factors, such as the specific cattle breed used. Have there ever been zubrons born to wisent mothers and cattle fathers?

      Delete
    3. I don't know if there are zubrons with cattle fathers, but the fact that wisent and cattle now have more difficulties interbreeding than in the late Pleistocene when the hybridization between bison and aurochs happened might be explained by the Wallace effect, as wisent and aurochs were sympatric.

      Delete
    4. I was wondering because Wisent, Plains Bison, Kalmyk cattle and Yaks all share Pleistocene Park. I haven’t heard of any interbreeding, or any breeding for that matter.

      Delete
    5. I think that's at least partially behavioural. The wisent probably would breed with the female bison if it had not already imprinted on the yaks. The American bison there are producing calves, as are the domestic yaks and cattle, though certainly no hybrids yet.

      Delete
    6. Why do wisent/cattle hybrids need a C-section?

      Delete
  3. With the difficulties in obtaining suitable semen, and the long time span needed for 5 generations, i'm not optimistic about yak introgression. Perhaps gene editing, as is planned for the Colossal project, would be more feasible to get those hard-to-find traits. That require aurochs to be as "sexy" as mammoths to secure the necessary funds though...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think genome editing to revive the aurochs will unfortunately never happen, for once because, as you say, the aurochs is probably not "sexy" enough, and because many people in de-extinction think it can be "bred back anyway". They would have to realize that it is not even nearly possible to revive the aurochs by selective breeding.

      Delete
  4. Reginald Winkler19 October 2021 at 01:29

    Quite exciting visual material and interesting information on the topic of wild yak can be found in the following video:

    https://www.ardmediathek.de/video/alpha-thema/die-rueckkehr-der-wildyaks/ard-alpha/Y3JpZDovL2JyLmRlL3ZpZGVvLzVmZWZjZWFlLWIwMTgtNGRiYy04NmY2LThlYTAwNGZhNGQ5NA/

    ReplyDelete
  5. When reading about the differences of Aurochs and Wild Yaks, its comes to my mind, that the American Bison and the European Bison have some differences too in the skeleton, like the european having less ribs and being taller, and little differences in the skull too. Comparing the skeleton of the Wild Yak and Aurochs, its seens there's a lot of similarities between. We don't know exactly what the Aurochs would look like, and thats whats is difficult about this. When you see the range that the Aurochs have, its spawn from Northern China to Central Asia, Europe and North Africa, for me this is a little strange, why the Wild Yak is confined only to the Tibetan Plateau. It would be natural that the species have expanded to another places. I think theres much more in common in the Wild Yak and the extinct Aurochs than we have discovered yet. Maybe differences between fossils, are problaby because a adaptation to mountains, since probably the Yak have been present at some moment in the mountains in Central Asia, Iran and Anatolia, very different from the plains in the north like Russia and Central Europe. Same thing with Banteng and Zebu cattle, Banteng was widespread in India at some point.

    ReplyDelete