Sunday, 1 December 2019

Breeding works with coincidence

When two individuals of different genotypes are crossed, it is not that important what the F1 looks like, as it represents maximum heterozygosity that is possible between two breeds. On each locus, it will have one allele from breed A and one from breed B while the goal of targeted breeding is the opposite, it wants to unite the desired traits of A and B on each locus homozygous, therefore, to stabilize the desired characteristics of the parental breeds in the new line. Therefore, the looks of an F1 are not actually all that relevant. In second-generation crosses, it becomes more complicated. Genes (or actually: chromosomes) get passed on entirely by coincidence, therefore there are numerous possibilities what a true F2 will look like, with a pure individual of breed A or B being the ends of the extremes. At this very early stage of crossbreeding, it would be a quite big coincidence if two F2 would happen to look exactly the same. I have an example from the Lippeaue here: 
 
Lale (Heck x Sayaguesa) x (Heck x Chianina)
Latina (Heck x Sayaguesa) x (Heck x Chianina) © Matthias Scharf
Both cows are (Sayaguesa x Heck) x (Chianina x Heck), yet they look very different. Lale has comparably long horn, a Heck cattle-like appearance overall except for the head, plus a slightly diluted coat colour. Latina, on the other hand, has the long-legged stature of Chianina and also the head and very small horns resemble Chianina. It has no phenotypically visible dilution in its coat colour. The likelihood for each trait was 1/4 for Sayaguesa or Chianina traits and 1/2 for Heck traits. 
There is also a (Sayaguesa x Heck) x (Grey cattle x Watussi) bull called Rimu in Hortobagy. It turned out quite nice as you see on the photos. It was a lucky coincidence that it looks this way, it could have also gotten the semi-dominant dilution of Steppe cattle, the short face of Heck cattle or upright horns. The likelihood would have been 1/4 for each of the traits of the founding breeds. 

So when I write “Sayaguesa and Chianina is a good combination” (f.e. here), I do not mean that I believe that F2 will perfectly unite the good traits of the founding individuals in one, but simply that they have the potential to do so. A F2 Chianina x Sayaguesa might either have a perfect aurochs colour, good horns, long faces, long legs and large size (the maximum potential for aurochs-likeness that is in this combination), or it might end up completely white or at least diluted, having tiny horns and being not as large and long-legged as Chianina (so none of the desired traits of the founding breeds united in one individual) – most individuals will end up somewhere in between. F2 will show the full spectrum of all possible phenotypes, no matter which breeds are involved. You can say the same of all possible genotypes as long as you are not crossing or backcrossing with purebred individuals (basically, the un-stable inheritance of Heck cattle, which have a heterogeneous genotype, represents the same phenomenon).  

Thus, breeding is simply a numbers game, you need either luck or you have the produce large quantities of the combinations and select the best out. As cattle unfortunately have the small litter size of only 1, perfect breeding takes a while.


8 comments:

  1. "Therefore, the looks of an F1 are not actually all that relevant."
    As far as i get it this should be true for recessive genes/traits,
    but then if the F1 lacks a dominant one and it is crossed with an animal that lacks it also, the F2 couldn't have it either.
    Right ?
    For the recessive ones there could be still a surprise...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Daniel/all, I have a long winded question so please forgive me. Let's pretend that magically in north east China, a wild type of bovine has been found in an isolated grassy valley with a population of 300. Their phenotype and genotype resembles Pleistocene aurochs from Europe and they look very like those from cave paintings. When they have been tested genetically they are found to also be Bos Primigenius Taurus like the original European aurochs but split away about 50,000 years ago with minimal interbreeding. They are not ancestral to domestic cattle. Could these imaginary wild cattle be released in Europe as the closest proxy for European aurochs or could they even be fully accepted as aurochs that were appropriate for Europe?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Super interesting! Is this real or just a hypothetical question?
      If it is real, spill the beans! Would love to see more information or links and pics.
      But to answer your question, they might be better suitable but it depends on their genetics too. If they form a different clade or can be seen as a separate subspecies, separate from Taurine and Zebu bloodlines then it would be a shame to just mix them in. If not then they could be used to strengthen or enhance breeding back projects. If they are a feral population they will probably not be an actual aurochs themselves either.

      Delete
    2. Alas no, just hypothetical. Their genetics would be close to those of the extinct wild European Aurochs, would not have split away earlier than 50,000 years ago. I posed it as a question but I believe such a population would be suitable to reintroduce into Europe. I also think that a wild horse, which split away from the European wild horse on that time scale which had the appropriate phenotype as animals that lived in Europe for many tens of thousands of years would be suitable to release in Europe hence the Przewalski horse.Instead of releasing primitive domestic horses, just release Przewalskis in reserves in Europe.

      Delete
  3. Daniel, how can I contact you? I photographed crosses with Istrian cattle (Boškarin) from Slovenia which you may find interesting. Thanks,
    Paul.Veenvliet (a) zavod-symbiosis.si

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Daniel,

    I'v just found this type of cow from South of France. The race is called "vache béarnaise"

    https://www.coeurdebearn.com/fileadmin/tourinsoft/images/vache-bearnaise.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  5. You're a gifted blogger. I have joined your feed and anticipate looking for a greater amount of your awesome post. Additionally, I have shared your site in my informal communities!
    MCAFEE.COM/ACTIVATE
    NORTON.COM/SETUP

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi, this is very typical sorting of Mendelian traits. A textbook about peas or fruitflies could show the same.
    best,
    Jurek

    ReplyDelete